Against the backdrop of tumultuous political transformations in Russia from 1900 to 1930, artists such as Zinaida Serebriakova, Boris Kustodiev, and Ilya Mashkov navigated a complex back-and-forth between government control, avant-garde aspirations, and the legacy of the "Peredvizhniki."The “Peredvizhniki,” formed in 1870, rebelled against academic constraints by showcasing realistic scenes in traveling exhibitions, influencing artists in their delicate negotiation between conforming to government-sanctioned aesthetics and embracing avant-garde movements. The self-portrait Woman at Her Toilette (1909) by Serebriakova, Kustodiev's nostalgic piece Merchant’s Wife at Tea (1918), and Mashkov's post-impressionist Nude (1918) serve as lenses through which to examine how these avant-garde artists responded to evolving political climates. Their artistic evolution reflects a delicate negotiation between conforming to or subverting government-sanctioned aesthetics, with influences from the avant-garde movements and the precedent-breaking spirit of the "Peredvizhniki" group.
Zinaida Serebriakova | Зинаида Серебрякова
Woman at Her Toilette/At the Dressing Table. Self Portrait | За туалетом. Автопортрет (1909)
Oil on Canvas | 30 inch x 26 inch
In Woman at Her Toilette (1909), Zinaida Serebriakova skillfully employs art techniques to convey intimate introspection, intimacy, and joy. The composition captures the artist in a private moment, with her dress slipping off her shoulder and her gaze fixed upon herself in a mirror. The light and shadow in this piece are carefully painted, particularly evident in the bracelet she’s wearing and the candlestick holder on the vanity table. The reflective metal surfaces catch the light, contrasting with the more painterly and glowing treatment of Serebriakova's hair and face. This handling of light not only adds depth to the composition but also emphasizes the artist's focus on capturing the warmth and serenity of the moment.
The choice of a self-portrait adds an extra layer of intimacy. By turning the lens inward, Serebriakova invites the viewer into her personal space. The informal and relaxed atmosphere conveyed by the dress slipping a little and the ease of her posture contributes to the overall joy of the piece.
Serebriakova's approach stands in contrast to the historical trend of male-identifying artists portraying women in private spaces through the lens of the male gaze. Such depictions often emphasized vulnerability and objectification. However, Serebriakova switches this narrative by placing herself at the center of the composition and reclaiming control over the portrayal. The male gaze in art has often presented women as passive objects, inviting the viewer to observe them from an external perspective. This gaze emphasizes vulnerability, often casting women in submissive or passive roles within the domestic sphere. In Woman at Her Toilette, Serebriakova disrupts this dynamic.
By presenting herself in an intimate moment of personal reflection, she challenges the typical portrayal of women by male artists and takes agency over her image. The deliberate act of creating a self-portrait in a private setting goes against the historical norm. Serebriakova's gaze into the mirror and her dress slipping suggest a self-assured and confident engagement with her image.
However, the joy depicted in Woman at Her Toilette starkly contrasts the tumultuous events that unfolded in Russia during this period. After her marriage, Serebriakova faced the upheavals of revolutionary uprisings in St Petersburg in 1905. Amidst the challenges of fleeing chaos and seeking refuge in Paris, Serebriakova encountered a massive shift in the artistic landscape, where abstractionism prevailed, diverging from the familiar peasant scenes and landscapes she held dear in Russia. Returning to Russia in 1906, leading to the 1917 revolution, became the most settled and creatively fulfilling years of Serebriakova’s life. Unfortunately, her creative streak fell apart due to the impact of government control once the revolution began. Her husband's arrest during the post-Revolutionary political reprisals (the Red Terror), followed by the destruction of their family estate by Bolsheviks in 1919, marked a tragic turn in Serebriakova's life. In the midst of all the chaos, Serebriakova's art became her escape.
Beyond showcasing her skill, Woman at Her Toilette is a reminder that even in uncertain times, finding moments of peace is a universal need. (Withers, Great European Lives: Zinaida Serebriakova)
Along with Boris Kustodiev's piece Merchant's Wife at Tea (1918), the artist employs realism to present a scene of apparent domestic tranquility, offering a stark contrast to the tumultuous historical context surrounding its creation. Known for his ability to capture his vision of Russian life, Kustodiev presents a fuller figure of a woman dressed in silky clothes seated at a table for tea. Kustodiev's realism shines through in the meticulous details of the composition. The types of fruit, as well as the elaborate samovar and the woman's lush attire, contribute to the opulence of the scene. The watermelon, often associated with summer and harvest, symbolizes abundance and fertility. Its vibrant red color and juicy inside evoke a sense of richness and prosperity. In the context of the painting, the watermelon on the table can be interpreted as a representation of the bountiful and peaceful life that was prevalent before the societal upheavals brought about by the revolution. Different fruits, such as grapes, apples, and oranges, that were displayed collectively suggest wealth and variety in sustenance. This reinforces the idea of a time when the merchant class, as depicted in the painting, enjoyed a life of material abundance and culinary richness. (Arthive. Merchant’s Wife at Tea by Boris Kustodiev, Saint Petersburg.)
Unlike traditional portrayals of women in private spaces that often lean towards the male gaze, Kustodiev's composition here doesn't seek to objectify or render the subject vulnerable. Instead, the woman exudes a sense of comfort and indulgence, emphasizing her agency in the domestic sphere. The artist's use of color, hues, and light is strong in portraying the hot mirror samovar and the gentle swaying of the hills in the background. The scene unfolds with a hint of sweetness and calmness, hedonistic in its celebration of domestic pleasures. Yet, the painting takes on a deeper, more personal meaning when considered against the backdrop of Kustodiev's challenging life circumstances.
Boris Kustodiyev | Борис Кустодиев
Merchant’s Wife at Tea | Купчиха за чаем (1918)
Oil on canvas | 47.2 inch x 47.2 inch
Boris Kustodiev faced a vast number of struggles, surviving the Russian Famine of 1921-1922, two revolutions, and a civil war. During the creation of Merchant's Wife at Tea, the euphoria he initially experienced with the revolution gave way to a harsh reality of hunger, poverty, and doubt. In this context, the seemingly idyllic scene depicted in the painting becomes a strong expression of nostalgia for a time of abundance and peace. The painting, often initially interpreted as a satirical commentary on the merchant class, is revealed to be a personal reflection of Kustodiev, capturing his complex emotions and struggles during a period of profound historical change. The opulence and bliss portrayed take on a dual nature, symbolizing a celebration of domestic pleasures and serving as a metaphor for the artist's yearning for a lost era amidst the societal upheavals he faced.
Many contemporaries saw it as a caricature, but as time progressed, it became evident that the artist painted it with a sense of loss and remembrance for the Russia that once was. The absence of revolutionary fires in the reflection of the hot samovar and the peaceful atmosphere emphasizes the personal nature of the painting – a longing for a homeland that Kustodiev, in the midst of historical chaos, desperately remembered. Merchant's Wife at Tea becomes a window into the artist's soul, portraying a personal connection to the Motherland amid the Russian Famine of 1921-1922 and the chaos of revolutionary change.
Ilya Mashkov | Илья Иванович Машков
Nude |Обнаженная (1918)
Oil on Canvas
Ilya Mashkov's post-impressionistic artwork, Nude (1918), is a vibrant demonstration of his role as one of the most influential artists of his time, navigating 1910-1920 in Russia. Mashkov's distinctive post-impressionist style, characterized by bright, warm tones juxtaposed with cooler ones, draws the viewer's attention to specific elements within the painting. The artist strategically guides the observer toward the figure's torso, a geometric composition adorned with blue, yellow, orange, pink, and red tones. Mashkov’s geometric aspects and post-impressionist style were influenced by local movements of “Russian Futurism”1 and the “Jack/Knave of Diamonds.”2 A fascinating element in this piece is Mashkov's use of primary colors, particularly the juxtaposition of red and blue. The blue flowers on the left side of the artwork interact dynamically with the deep red drape or curtain, creating a visually engaging and layered composition. Mashkov’s painting, as well as Kustodiev and Serebrivkoa's works, explores women in private spaces and aligns with the broader artistic trend in Russia at the time. Mashkov's portrayal of the female form within private settings adds a nuanced layer to the narrative. Mashkov's approach, marked by tangible sensuality and vivid imagery, provides a counterpoint to societal norms.
Mashkov's artistic journey, studying under influential figures like Korovin, Serov, Arkhipov, and Pasternak, reflects the dynamic artistic environment. Mashkov was involved with avant-garde movements, like the "Jack/Knave of Diamonds"3 and the "World of Art," demonstrating his commitment to breaking artistic boundaries.
This, with its rich color palette, thick applications of paint, and expressiveness, encapsulates Mashkov's style that can be seen as a precursor to postmodernism within the frame of socialist realism. Mashkov's Nude (1918) contributes to the exploration of how avant-garde artists navigated the complexities of government control, avant-garde aspirations, and the legacy of the "Peredvizhniki."
The escapism of the works of Zinaida Serebriakova, Boris Kustodiyev, and Ilya Mashkov provides a richly painted view of Russian art during the transformative years from 1900 to 1930. Against the backdrop of political upheavals and societal shifts, these avant-garde artists skillfully navigated between government control, avant-garde aspirations, and the legacy of the “Peredvizhniki” movement. Zinaida Serebriakova's Woman at Her Toilette (1909), a striking self-portrait, serves as a strong reflection of her personal journey amid societal changes. Serebriakova's narrative becomes intertwined with historical events, such as the Russian Revolution, demonstrating the impact of political turmoil on an artist's life and work. Boris Kustodiyev's nostalgic piece, Merchant's Wife at Tea (1918), exemplifies his ability to weave social commentary into his art.
Example of Russian Futurism
Cyclist (1913) | Natalia Goncharova | Oil on canvas 31 inch × 41 inch | Located at the State Russian Museum, Saint Petersburg
The painting, with its depiction of abundance and hedonism, has undertones of bitterness, reflecting the artist's own experiences during the post-revolutionary hardships. Kustodiyev's work mirrors societal transformations, revealing the complex emotions and challenges faced by individuals within the shifting political landscape. Ilya Mashkov's Nude (1918), with its post-impressionistic style and vibrant color palette, captures the artist's role as a prominent figure in the avant-garde movements of the time. Mashkov's exploration of the female form within private spaces adds a layer of nuance to the narrative. The painting becomes a visual representation of the delicate negotiation between conforming to or subverting government-sanctioned aesthetics; a theme echoed in the broader avant-garde movements. The common thread among these artists is their connection to the “Peredvizhniki” movement, a group that challenged the academic constraints of its time. The “Peredvizhniki's” legacy influenced their artistic choices and provided a foundation for their engagement with the evolving political climates.
In essence, the self-portrait by Serebriakova, the nostalgic piece by Kustodiyev, and the post-impressionistic exploration by Mashkov collectively serve as lenses to examine the interplay of individual expression, societal expectations, and political upheavals. As these artists navigated the tumultuous years from 1900 to 1930, they left behind a legacy that transcends artistic movements, capturing the spirit of a transformative era in Russian art.
Fer, B. “Metaphor and Modernity: Russian Constructivism.” Oxford Art Journal 12, no. 1 (January 1, 1989): 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/12.1.14.
Friedman, Jane, ed. Soviet Dis-Union: Socialist Realist & Nonconformist Art. Translated by Dmitrii Fedosov. 2006. Reprint, Minneapolis: The Museum of Russian Art, 2006.
Margolin, Victor. “Constructivism and the Modern Poster.” Art Journal 44, no. 1 (March 1984): 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.1984.10792516.
Milner, John. A Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Artists, 1420-1970. ACC Distribution, 1993.
Rosenfeld, Alla, and Norton T. Dodge. Nonconformist Art: The Soviet Experience, 1956-1986 : The Norton and Nancy Dodge Collection, the Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. Thames & Hudson, 1995.
The Female Portrait in Russian Art (12thearly 2Oth Centuries): By L. Mochalov and N. Barabanova : Introduced by L. Mochalov, 1974.
Withers, Matt. “Great European Lives: Zinaida Serebriakova.” The New European, September 21, 2020. https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/brexit-news-europe-news-charlie-connelly-on-russian-artist-zinaida-serebriakova-92620/.
Admin. “Soviet Painter Ilya Mashkov.” Soviet Art, August 3, 2016. https://soviet-art.ru/soviet-painter-ilya-mashkov/.
Arthive. “Boris Kustodiev (Painter): Biography Artist, Paintings, Famous Works, Art Style & Facts.” September 21, 2023. https://arthive.com/boriskustodiev.
Arthive. “The ‘Knave of Diamonds,’” March 11, 2015. https://arthive.com/encyclopedia/804~The_Knave_of_Diamonds.
Arthive. “Ilya Mashkov (29.07.1881 - 20.03.1944) - Biography, Interesting Facts, Famous Artworks.” https://arthive.com/artists/1216~Ilya_Mashkov.
Arthive. “Merchant’s Wife at Tea by Boris Kustodiev, Saint Petersburg.” https://arthive.com/boriskustodiev/works/7951~Merchants_wife_at_tea.
Arthive. “Zinaida Serebriakova: Biography.” Accessed December 3, 2023. https://arthive.com/zinaidaserebriakova/biography.
The Art Story. “Peredvizhniki Movement Overview.” Accessed December 5, 2023. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/peredvizhniki/.
The Art Story. “Russian Futurism Movement Overview.” Accessed December 5, 2023. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/russian-futurism/.